欧美AV

The Title IX Coordinator oversees implementation of the University's Title IX Sexual Harassment Policy and Grievance Procedure. The Title IX Coordinator has the primary responsibility for coordinating the University鈥檚 efforts related to the intake, investigation, resolution, and implementation of supportive measures to stop, remediate, and prevent sexual harassment and retaliation.

The Title IX Coordinator reviews each report and: (1) respond to any immediate health or safety concerns raised by the report, including determining any initial support measures for all parties; (2) offer the institution鈥檚 immediate support and assistance; and (3) assess the nature and circumstances of the report to determine whether the reported conduct rises a potential policy violation.

The Deputy Coordinator assist the Title IX Coordinator in implementation of the University's Title IX Sexual Harassment Policy and Grievance Procedure. They assist with implementation of supportive measures. The Deputy Coordinator can also act as the Hearing Facilitator during the formal grievance process.

The hearing facilitator during a formal hearing attends to: logistics of rooms for various parties/witnesses as they wait; flow of parties/witnesses in and out of the hearing space; ensuring recording and/or virtual conferencing technology is working as intended.   

Campus Mediators are available to serve as facilitators in those situations where an informal option has been selected as the method of complaint resolution.

These persons are trained for generalized mediation scenarios and specifically trained for mediations involving allegations of sexual harassment, stalking, domestic violence, dating violence or sexual assault.

The Sexual Harassment Investigative Panel (SHIP) consists of employees of the University who represent the various segments of the University, including staff, faculty and campuses.

SHIP Investigators are designated by the Title IX Coordinator to conduct reliable, prompt, fair, and impartial investigations of sex- and gender-based discrimination and misconduct reports, including identifying and interviewing parties and witnesses; identifying, organizing, and compiling relevant information; maintaining accurate and thorough investigation records and notes; and writing clear, concise, and comprehensive investigation reports.

The Title IX Coordinator ensures that the assigned SHIP Investigators for any specific case have the appropriate knowledge and training (consistent with the requirements of 34 CFR 搂106.45 b(1)(iii)) and are free from conflicts of interest or bias for or against any party involved in the reported incident(s) prior to case assignment or as soon as a conflict is apparent.

欧美AV will designate a single Hearing Officer/Decision-Maker for each formal grievance hearing. The Hearing Officer/Decision-Maker will not have had any previous involvement with the investigation.

The Hearing Officer/Decision-Maker are individuals who have the authority to determine whether or not institutional policy was violated in accordance with the specified standard of proof and to determine appropriate remedies and corrective action/sanctions. The Hearing Officer/Decision-Maker will facilitate a live hearing process, including permitting the parties to ask the other part(ies) and any witnesses all relevant questions and follow-up questions, including those challenging credibility.

Hearing Officers/Decision-Makers are appropriately trained (consistent with the requirements of 34 CFR 搂106.45 b(1)(iii)) and must be free from conflicts of interest or bias for or against any party involved in the reported incident(s).

An Advisor is an individual selected by any party to assist them throughout the institution鈥檚 resolution process. The parties may each have an Advisor of their choice present with them for all meetings, interviews, and hearings within the resolution process, if they so choose. The parties may select whomever they wish to serve as their Advisor as long as the Advisor is eligible and available.

The Advisor may be a friend, mentor, family member, attorney, or any other individual a party chooses to advise, support, and/or consult with them throughout the resolution process. The parties may choose Advisors from inside or outside of the University鈥檚 community.

The Title IX Coordinator will also offer to assign a trained Advisor for any party if the party so chooses. If the parties choose to accept the Advisor from the University, the Advisor will be trained by the University and be familiar with the University鈥檚 resolution process.

In accordance with U.S. Department of Education regulations under Title IX, a form of indirect questioning is required during the hearing, but must be conducted by the parties鈥� Advisors. The parties are not permitted to directly question each other or any witnesses. If a party does not have an Advisor for a hearing, the University will appoint a trained Advisor for the limited purpose of conducting any questioning of the other party and witnesses. 

A single Appeal Officer will review appeal requests. All parties have an equal opportunity to appeal. The Request for Appeal will be forwarded to the Appeal Officer for consideration to determine if the request meets the grounds for appeal.

No appeal panelists will have been involved in the process previously, including any dismissal appeal that may have been heard earlier in the process.

 Appeal Officers will be appropriately trained (consistent with the requirements of 34 CFR 搂106.45 b(1)(iii)) and be free from conflicts of interest or bias for or against any party involved in the reported incident(s).